Popular Searches:

    Virtual ISPOR

    Real-world evidence research presented at International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Annual Meeting

    Last updated: June 23, 2021

    Natural language processing-based detection of transgender and gender non-conforming patients in electronic health record-derived data

    Ian J. Hooley et al.

    Ian J. Hooley et al.

    Studying transgender and gender non-conforming (GNC) individuals using EHR-derived RWD is difficult as gender identity indicators are not reliably populated in structured data fields. Researchers from Flatiron Health looked to develop a natural language processing-based approach to detect transgender and GNC patients based on patient charts within a real-world dataset.

    Why this matters

    Studying health outcomes in rare patient populations continues to be an unmet need. This is particularly true for populations that are know to have inferior healthcare outcomes relative to the broader population, such as transgender and gender non-conforming patients.

    While real-world data sources represent promising tools to find and study these populations, variations in documentation workflows (e.g., lack of structured gender identity information) continue to limit research. This study presents an approach to overcome that problem in the context of transgender and gender non-confirming patient research by deploying natural language processing to scan unstructured EHR documents. Strategies like this can enable research geared towards tackling disparities in care and outcomes for rare and underserved populations.

    View the abstract on the ISPOR website
    Venn diagram of overlap between NLP algorithm and ICD coded patients who are transgender or gender non-conforming

    Studying transgender and gender non-conforming (GNC) individuals using EHR-derived RWD is difficult as gender identity indicators are not reliably populated in structured data fields. Researchers from Flatiron Health looked to develop a natural language processing-based approach to detect transgender and GNC patients based on patient charts within a real-world dataset.

    Why this matters

    Studying health outcomes in rare patient populations continues to be an unmet need. This is particularly true for populations that are know to have inferior healthcare outcomes relative to the broader population, such as transgender and gender non-conforming patients.

    While real-world data sources represent promising tools to find and study these populations, variations in documentation workflows (e.g., lack of structured gender identity information) continue to limit research. This study presents an approach to overcome that problem in the context of transgender and gender non-confirming patient research by deploying natural language processing to scan unstructured EHR documents. Strategies like this can enable research geared towards tackling disparities in care and outcomes for rare and underserved populations.

    View the abstract on the ISPOR website

    View more arrow_viewmore_02

    Can early US adoption of cancer drugs inform HTA decision making?

    Blythe Adamson et al.

    Blythe Adamson et al.

    Variation in time-to-approval of new drugs internationally could enable the use of RWD from the US to information health technology appraisals (HTAs). This research conducted by NICE, Flatiron Health and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center explored whether time from FDA approval to NICE guidance might provide an opportunity to inform reimbursement decisions with real-world US patients.

    Why this matters

    Health Technology Appraisals (HTAs) are quickly becoming a critical component of population-level decision processes in healthcare. Yet, they often have to be conducted based on information generated within the limited boundaries of clinical trials.

    Real-world data can be effectively incorporated in these processes to vastly expand their scope, depth and insight on the anticipated impact of new technologies. One potential approach can be to leverage the learnings gleaned from regions with early drug approvals to inform subsequent appraisals as they roll out. By documenting the extent to which US approvals of oncology drugs precede European ones, this study opens the door to a fertile research area for the generation of valuable insights relevant to HTAs.

    View the abstract on the ISPOR website
    Patients who received at least one dose of the drug of interest, among an EHR-derived cohort of cancer patients in the US, during the months following FDA approval, stratified by NICE recommendation.

    Variation in time-to-approval of new drugs internationally could enable the use of RWD from the US to information health technology appraisals (HTAs). This research conducted by NICE, Flatiron Health and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center explored whether time from FDA approval to NICE guidance might provide an opportunity to inform reimbursement decisions with real-world US patients.

    Why this matters

    Health Technology Appraisals (HTAs) are quickly becoming a critical component of population-level decision processes in healthcare. Yet, they often have to be conducted based on information generated within the limited boundaries of clinical trials.

    Real-world data can be effectively incorporated in these processes to vastly expand their scope, depth and insight on the anticipated impact of new technologies. One potential approach can be to leverage the learnings gleaned from regions with early drug approvals to inform subsequent appraisals as they roll out. By documenting the extent to which US approvals of oncology drugs precede European ones, this study opens the door to a fertile research area for the generation of valuable insights relevant to HTAs.

    View the abstract on the ISPOR website

    View more arrow_viewmore_02

    Statistical methods for pantumor analysis: models to account for tumor-level heterogeneity

    Akshay Swaminathan et al.

    Akshay Swaminathan et al.

    As interest grows in the development of tumor-agnostic treatments, these pan-tumor analyses can be difficult due to tumor-level differences. In this poster, researchers compared the performance of six Cox models for estimating simulated tumor-specific and pantumor effects of a biomarker on overall survival. Across these models, they saw similar performance for estimating pantumor effects, with a random-effects Cox model performing the most favorably.

    Why this matters

    One of the most striking developments in oncology is the refined understanding of malignancies driven by distinct genetic or genomic alterations, which can be present across multiple ‘traditional’ tumor types, i.e., in pan-tumor settings. While these settings have seen multiple drug approvals in recent years, research in this area continues to be challenging.

    The conduct of studies, and the interpretation of results generated across disparate clinical contexts is a laborious task, often carried out on small patient samples. This study provides a framework to aid and support these studies, and proposes another analytical tool that could further a nascent research field.

    View the abstract on the ISPOR website
    Distribution of tumor-specific effects for fixed effect, random effect, and separate models, as well as the true distribution of tumor-specific effects across all simulations. The percentage of simulations where a given model's absolute error was lowest is shown.

    As interest grows in the development of tumor-agnostic treatments, these pan-tumor analyses can be difficult due to tumor-level differences. In this poster, researchers compared the performance of six Cox models for estimating simulated tumor-specific and pantumor effects of a biomarker on overall survival. Across these models, they saw similar performance for estimating pantumor effects, with a random-effects Cox model performing the most favorably.

    Why this matters

    One of the most striking developments in oncology is the refined understanding of malignancies driven by distinct genetic or genomic alterations, which can be present across multiple ‘traditional’ tumor types, i.e., in pan-tumor settings. While these settings have seen multiple drug approvals in recent years, research in this area continues to be challenging.

    The conduct of studies, and the interpretation of results generated across disparate clinical contexts is a laborious task, often carried out on small patient samples. This study provides a framework to aid and support these studies, and proposes another analytical tool that could further a nascent research field.

    View the abstract on the ISPOR website

    View more arrow_viewmore_02

    Enhanced cost-effectiveness analysis using EHR data for real-world value

    Akshay Swaminathan et al.

    Akshay Swaminathan et al.

    EHR-derived RWE has been shown to be more relevant, timely, and representative for health technology appraisal (HTA) decision-making compared to evidence from clinical trials. This study found that RWE can reduce uncertainty in cost-effectiveness estimates due to larger sample sizes and longer duration of follow-up times compared to published trial data.

    Why this matters

    While clinical trials are a gold standard to establish the efficacy of new drugs, their use as source for health technology appraisals (HTAs) faces limitations to generate reliable estimates of effectiveness and value at the population level.

    This study characterizes how two core real-world evidence (RWE) attributes, the ability to accrue large patient cohorts and to aggregate longitudinal data throughout relatively long follow up periods, can address the shortcomings found in clinical trial evidence, and potentially lead to more precise evaluations of the impact of new technologies.

    View the abstract on the ISPOR website
    For RWE-enhanced (purple) and traditional (green) cost-effectiveness models, the simulated ICERs resulting from probabilistic sensitivity analyses comparing atezolizumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab to chemotherapy. The dashed reference line indicates an ICER of $100,000/QALY.

    EHR-derived RWE has been shown to be more relevant, timely, and representative for health technology appraisal (HTA) decision-making compared to evidence from clinical trials. This study found that RWE can reduce uncertainty in cost-effectiveness estimates due to larger sample sizes and longer duration of follow-up times compared to published trial data.

    Why this matters

    While clinical trials are a gold standard to establish the efficacy of new drugs, their use as source for health technology appraisals (HTAs) faces limitations to generate reliable estimates of effectiveness and value at the population level.

    This study characterizes how two core real-world evidence (RWE) attributes, the ability to accrue large patient cohorts and to aggregate longitudinal data throughout relatively long follow up periods, can address the shortcomings found in clinical trial evidence, and potentially lead to more precise evaluations of the impact of new technologies.

    View the abstract on the ISPOR website

    View more arrow_viewmore_02

    Quantifying bias in Flatiron ML-extracted variables for inference in clinical oncology

    Jaron Lee et al.

    Jaron Lee et al.

    Machine learning (ML) can be used to extract clinically relevant information from EHRs for the purposes of conducting analyses using real-world data. Of late, there has been increased discussion on biases in machine learning models that necessitated further exploration. This study assessed the effects of misclassification error in ML-extracted clinical variables when used in statistical analyses.

    Why this matters

    Real-world data sources have well known limitations, such as the challenges associated with extracting information suitable for analysis from unstructured documents (notes, reports). This extraction has been traditionally carried out by manual abstraction, which is a burdensome and resource intensive process hard to scale.

    Machine learning (ML) tools have emerged as a valuable approach to automate the extraction of information from medical documents. The rigorous deployment of ML-extracted information for clinical research, however, demands analytic transparency. It is important to evaluate ML-extracted variables in the context of data quality, to understand their reliability and their potential for error, to ultimately control for the biases that these variables may introduce in subsequent analyses. This study takes two ML-extracted variables in an EHR-derived dataset to characterize their quality and estimate the associated risk for downstream analytic biases, in a seminal approach to the investigation of data quality in the realm of ML-extracted variables.

    Watch the on-demand presentation (registration required)
    Results show that using ML-extracted confounders can affect estimated overall survival

    Machine learning (ML) can be used to extract clinically relevant information from EHRs for the purposes of conducting analyses using real-world data. Of late, there has been increased discussion on biases in machine learning models that necessitated further exploration. This study assessed the effects of misclassification error in ML-extracted clinical variables when used in statistical analyses.

    Why this matters

    Real-world data sources have well known limitations, such as the challenges associated with extracting information suitable for analysis from unstructured documents (notes, reports). This extraction has been traditionally carried out by manual abstraction, which is a burdensome and resource intensive process hard to scale.

    Machine learning (ML) tools have emerged as a valuable approach to automate the extraction of information from medical documents. The rigorous deployment of ML-extracted information for clinical research, however, demands analytic transparency. It is important to evaluate ML-extracted variables in the context of data quality, to understand their reliability and their potential for error, to ultimately control for the biases that these variables may introduce in subsequent analyses. This study takes two ML-extracted variables in an EHR-derived dataset to characterize their quality and estimate the associated risk for downstream analytic biases, in a seminal approach to the investigation of data quality in the realm of ML-extracted variables.

    Watch the on-demand presentation (registration required)

    View more arrow_viewmore_02